Barndominium Builders in Tom Green County, TX
Tom Green County is one of the few Texas counties with a residential building standard on its unincorporated land. On 8 June 2010 the Commissioners Court passed an order making Subchapter F of Chapter 233 applicable here, so a new house or duplex outside San Angelo has to conform to the International Residential Code and take three inspections. What it does not have is a building permit, a fee, a plan review or an inspector — the statute forbids all four, and the builder contracts the inspections privately. Almost everything else here is decided by the ground rather than the code. San Angelo holds 100,640 of the county's 120,602 people, which leaves about fourteen people to each of the 1,462 square miles outside the city limits. Roughly half the county reads caliche or limestone within about fifteen inches of the surface, which settles what a footing trench and a drainfield cost long before anyone opens a code book.
Tom Green County at a glance
- County
- Tom Green County
- Population
- 120,602
- Where we build
- San Angelo, Taylor County
- Site visits
- Site walks booked county-wide, San Angelo included
ZIPs 76901, 76902, 76903, 76904, 76905, 76908, 76909, 76934 and more
Building conditions in Tom Green County
What actually changes from one Texas jurisdiction to the next: who issues the permit, whether the residential code is enforced there at all, what the structure has to be engineered to, and what the ground is like. These are the numbers your drawings have to satisfy.
Resolution to Make Subchapter F, Chapter 233, Texas Local Government Code, Applicable to Tom Green County, passed and approved by the Commissioners Court 8 June 2010, attached to the minutes of that meeting — https://public.destinyhosted.com/agenda_publish.cfm?id=86647&mt=ALL&get_month=6&get_year=2010&dsp=min&seq=151
Texas Local Government Code ch. 233 secs. 233.152, 233.153 and 233.154 — https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/LG/htm/lg.233.htm
Texas Local Government Code ch. 233 secs. 233.152, 233.153 and 233.154 — https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/LG/htm/lg.233.htm; City of San Angelo, Codes & Regulations, current adopted codes — https://www.sanangelo.gov/188/Codes-Regulations; Resolution to Make Subchapter F, Chapter 233, Texas Local Government Code, Applicable to Tom Green County, passed and approved by the Commissioners Court 8 June 2010, attached to the minutes of that meeting — https://public.destinyhosted.com/agenda_publish.cfm?id=86647&mt=ALL&get_month=6&get_year=2010&dsp=min&seq=151
Order Adopting Rules of Tom Green County, Texas for On-Site Sewage Facilities, secs. 6, 8, 9, 10(A), 12 and 13, adopted after public hearing 18 August 2014 — https://public.destinyhosted.com/tomgrmindocs/2014/COM/20140818_490/minutes/467_Order%20Adopting%20Rules%20TGC%20On-Site%20Sewage%20Facility.pdf
USDA-NRCS Soil Data Access, SSURGO survey area TX451 Tom Green County, legend, mapunit, component, chorizon, corestrictions and muaggatt tables, queried 1 September 2026 — https://SDMDataAccess.sc.egov.usda.gov
San Angelo Code of Ordinances secs. 2.07.251 and 2.07.252 (Ord. No. 2018-121, sec. 1 (Exh. A), 2 October 2018) and ch. 12 Exhibit B, Airport Zoning Regulations, secs. 3-3-1, 3-3-2, 3-3-5 and 3-3-7 — https://library.municode.com/tx/san_angelo/codes/code_of_ordinances; Texas Local Government Code sec. 241.014 — https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/LG/htm/lg.241.htm
Also worth knowing before you build in Tom Green County
- Fourteen people to the square mile once you leave San Angelo
- San Angelo is the only incorporated municipality in Tom Green County. The Census Bureau publishes the split directly: 100,640 people in the city in 2025 against a balance of county of 19,962, out of 120,602 in all. The city covers 60.06 square miles of the county's 1,522.32, so 1,462 square miles — about 96 percent of the land — sits outside every city limit and holds about 14 people to the square mile. That is the thinnest unincorporated density of any county page on this site. It also means the county is essentially flat in population: 120,002 at the 2020 census against 120,602 in 2025.
- A groundwater district covers part of the county, and a small tract needs a drilling permit
- The Lipan-Kickapoo Water Conservation District covers about 3,535 square miles across parts of Tom Green, Runnels and Concho counties, and its own management plan names San Angelo, Christoval and Grape Creek inside it. Its rules invert the usual expectation on small tracts: a well used solely for domestic or livestock use on 10 acres or less is not exempt under Water Code sec. 36.117 and a drilling permit must be applied for and approved before drilling. A genuinely exempt well is still not unregulated — the district's rules say an exempt well is exempt from permitting but not from preregistration, registration or the spacing rules, and preregistration has to be filed and approved before any drilling, reworking or re-equipping.
- Well spacing is 330 feet, and it decides where the house can sit
- District Rule 9.1 requires every well to be at least 330 feet from the nearest well or authorized well site and at least 50 feet from the nearest property line. For a well used solely for domestic and livestock use the property-line distance can drop to 10 feet, but only if the annular space between casing and borehole is cemented from the land surface to the top of the production layer. If the well goes in within 280 feet of a property line, wells along that line must be at least 660 feet apart. On a small tract those distances, the septic drainfield and the building envelope all have to be solved together rather than one at a time.
- The plat application gates on a water-district letter and on your own commissioner
- The county's subdivision application, revised May 2025, is reviewed by the Environmental Health Department rather than a planning office. It opens by asking whether the site is in the City of San Angelo annexation portion of the extraterritorial jurisdiction, and if it is, tells the applicant to stop and file the plat with the City of San Angelo instead. It asks whether the land is in the Lipan-Kickapoo Water District and, if so, requires a letter from the district authorising drilling. It requires a development and suitability study under 30 Texas Administrative Code sec. 285.4(c), written approval of road names and addressing from the CVCOG 911 addressing coordinator, and written notification from the applicant's own precinct commissioner before the application can even go to the County Clerk.
- The floodplain order is keyed to the federal rule, and its elevation figure is not published
- On 29 May 2012 the Commissioners Court moved to adopt an ordinance for the floodplain management measures that satisfy 44 Code of Federal Regulations sec. 60.3(d) of the National Flood Insurance Program regulations. It carried four to one, with the Precinct 3 commissioner voting nay. That motion names a federal regulation and no Water Code section at all. Environmental Health administers the permit and states that it determines how high new construction has to be elevated, but the adopted text is not posted, so any freeboard above base flood elevation has to be confirmed with that office at (325) 658-1038 rather than assumed. On the soil survey, about 61,000 of 986,490 acres are rated occasional or frequent for flooding.
- The shop bay does not enlarge the drainfield
- Septic capacity in Texas keys off living area, not total structure area. TCEQ form TCEQ-0235 asks for bedrooms and living area in square feet, and the Chapter 285 table pairs the two tests with an or. Some counties' authorised agents publish stricter definitions that pull a loft or an attached garage into living area. Tom Green County's order does not: its Section 10 list of stricter rules runs to a single item about the ten-acre exemption, and nothing in it touches living area. So on a 4,000 square foot barndominium with 1,800 square feet of three-bedroom living space and a 2,200 square foot shop, the design flow is the three-bedroom figure. There is also no percolation test anywhere in Texas — Chapter 285 classifies soil by texture and assigns a loading rate.
- The court said no twice before it said yes
- The deliberation record is unusually clear here. On 1 September 2009, the day H.B. 2833 took effect, the court considered approving an order to continue a Residential Inspection Program and require inspection reports to be filed with the County Clerk, per HB 2833. The minutes record: no action. On 1 June 2010 it considered the San Angelo Home Builders resolution supporting adoption of the terms of HB 2833. Again: no action. On 8 June 2010, with two Home Builders Association representatives at the table, it adopted the resolution — and the document attached to those minutes is the county's Subchapter F order itself. Across the whole 1995 to present minutes archive the string 2833 appears in exactly four items, all of them above, and nothing since rescinds it.
- Expansive clay exists here but it is the exception, not the rule
- The soil survey shows components with a horizon linear extensibility of 9 percent or more on about 15,094 acres — roughly 1.5 percent of the county's mapped area. The two that drive it are Tobosa, at about 11,130 acres with a peak linear extensibility of 17 and around 50 percent clay, and Lipan, at about 4,185 acres and a peak of 9.3. Everything else sits well below them: Angelo peaks at 7.5, Tarrant at 7.8, Mereta at 4.5, Cho at 1.6. Where the survey does show that shrink-swell ground, the IRC's own route applies — R403.1.8 hands expansive-soil foundations to the International Building Code section 1808.6 at a plasticity index of 15 or more, which is a Texas-licensed engineer's work.
- The mineral estate is dominant, and a house that is not built yet is not protected
- In Merriman v. XTO Energy the Supreme Court of Texas confirmed that the mineral estate is the dominant estate, and the accommodation doctrine did not save the surface owner even though, in the court's own words, his home and a barn are on the tract. The doctrine protects an existing surface use, so a house that has not been built cannot be weighed against a drilling plan. Tom Green County sits on the eastern flank of the Permian: the Railroad Commission counted 785 oil wells and 87 gas wells in the county as of February 2025, 558 and 60 of them producing. Whether the minerals under a particular tract were severed is a title question, not a county one — it is answered by the County Clerk's records and by the title commitment, not by anything the county publishes.
- Two state requirements survive the gaps in county authority
- The rural exemption in the Texas plumbing licence law does not reach plumbing performed in connection with new construction, so a Texas-licensed plumber is required on a new house here whatever the county does about inspections. And Health and Safety Code sec. 388.004 obliges a builder outside a municipality to certify that a new single-family house complies with the state energy standard. Tom Green County is climate zone 3B on both the pre-2021 and the 2021 Department of Energy county assignments, so unlike much of North Texas the zone does not shift with whichever code edition the builder elects under the county's order.
- A septic variance here is an item on the Commissioners Court agenda
- Section 13 of the county's septic order sends anyone aggrieved by a decision of the designated representative to the Commissioners Court, and the minutes show that route being used one property at a time. On 19 January 2010 the court authorised a one-time variance from the 100-foot septic-to-well setback for two named addresses. On 22 June 2010 it approved a septic variance at an address in Grape Creek for an irrigation well. On 31 May 2011 it authorised construction of an unoccupied building while a septic permit was still being processed. That is not a permit counter — it is a vote, per property, in open court.
- The military-lighting power people expect a base town to have does not exist here
- Goodfellow Air Force Base sits in Tom Green County, which invites the assumption that the county holds special powers over lighting near it. It does not. Local Government Code sec. 240.032(b-1) is the military limb of the county outdoor-lighting subchapter, and it applies only to a county with a population of more than one million that has at least five United States military bases, and to an adjacent county within five miles of a United States Army installation. Tom Green County had 120,602 people in 2025, has one installation, and that installation is Air Force. Both limbs fail. The other limbs of the subchapter are astronomical-observatory limbs keyed to McDonald, George and the Stephen F. Austin State University observatories, none of which is near here.
- The county is the septic authority for the whole county, with no carve-outs
- TCEQ's authorised agent register returns two rows for Tom Green County: the Tom Green County Authorized Agent, area served entire County, and TCEQ Region 08 in San Angelo. There is no river authority band, no health district, no city holding its own designation and no private contractor in the register, which is unusual — nine different arrangements appear across the counties on this site. The order matches the register: it applies to all areas lying within the county except areas regulated under an existing order. The work is done in-house by a TCEQ-certified designated representative and site evaluator at the Edd B. Keyes Building, 113 W. Beauregard Avenue, San Angelo.
U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2025 county and sub-county population estimates (co-est2025-alldata.csv and sub-est2025.csv) and the 2024 Gazetteer county and place files — https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/datasets/2020-2025/
Lipan-Kickapoo Water Conservation District Rules, adopted 4 August 2004 with amendments adopted 1 November 2006 and 5 September 2007, Rules 2.1, 7.2, 8.1 and 9.1 — http://lipan-kickapoo.org/FILES/Rules-Manual_of_Hearings/Final_Rules_Aug-04_Complete_with_Amendments_Nov-06_Sept-07_-Adopted_40_pgs_-_For_Printing_112007.pdf; Lipan-Kickapoo Water Conservation District Groundwater Management Plan 2023-2028, adopted 8 March 2023, Location and Extent — https://www.twdb.texas.gov/groundwater/docs/GCD/lkwcd/lkwcd_mgmt_plan2023.pdf
Lipan-Kickapoo Water Conservation District Rules, adopted 4 August 2004 with amendments adopted 1 November 2006 and 5 September 2007, Rules 2.1, 7.2, 8.1 and 9.1 — http://lipan-kickapoo.org/FILES/Rules-Manual_of_Hearings/Final_Rules_Aug-04_Complete_with_Amendments_Nov-06_Sept-07_-Adopted_40_pgs_-_For_Printing_112007.pdf
Tom Green County Subdivision of Land / Manufactured Home Rental Community Application Form, revised May 2025 — https://www.tomgreencountytx.gov/upload/page/0120/docs/202505PlatApplicationRevised.pdf; Tom Green County Order Establishing Regulations for the Division of Land and the Development and Platting of Subdivisions, adopted 1 December 2020 and amended 2024 — https://www.tomgreencountytx.gov/upload/page/0120/docs/202403SubdivRegAmend.pdf
Tom Green County Commissioners Court minutes, full-text archive 1995 to date — https://public.destinyhosted.com/agenda_publish.cfm?id=86647; Tom Green County Environmental Health — https://www.tomgreencountytx.gov/page/env.EnvHealthHome; USDA-NRCS Soil Data Access, SSURGO survey area TX451 Tom Green County, legend, mapunit, component, chorizon, corestrictions and muaggatt tables, queried 1 September 2026 — https://SDMDataAccess.sc.egov.usda.gov
Order Adopting Rules of Tom Green County, Texas for On-Site Sewage Facilities, secs. 6, 8, 9, 10(A), 12 and 13, adopted after public hearing 18 August 2014 — https://public.destinyhosted.com/tomgrmindocs/2014/COM/20140818_490/minutes/467_Order%20Adopting%20Rules%20TGC%20On-Site%20Sewage%20Facility.pdf; 30 Texas Administrative Code ch. 285 secs. 285.3, 285.4, 285.30 and 285.33 and Table III, adopted by Tom Green County without amendment; TCEQ form TCEQ-0235
Tom Green County Commissioners Court minutes, full-text archive 1995 to date — https://public.destinyhosted.com/agenda_publish.cfm?id=86647
USDA-NRCS Soil Data Access, SSURGO survey area TX451 Tom Green County, legend, mapunit, component, chorizon, corestrictions and muaggatt tables, queried 1 September 2026 — https://SDMDataAccess.sc.egov.usda.gov
Merriman v. XTO Energy, Inc., No. 11-0494 (Tex. 2013), Supreme Court of Texas opinion; Railroad Commission of Texas, Oil Well Counts by County and Gas Well Counts by County, as of February 2025 — https://www.rrc.texas.gov/oil-and-gas/research-and-statistics/well-information/well-distribution-by-county/
Texas Occupations Code sec. 1301.052 — https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/OC/htm/oc.1301.htm; Texas Health and Safety Code ch. 388 secs. 388.003 and 388.004; U.S. Department of Energy county climate zone assignments for Texas FIPS 48451
Tom Green County Commissioners Court minutes, full-text archive 1995 to date — https://public.destinyhosted.com/agenda_publish.cfm?id=86647; Order Adopting Rules of Tom Green County, Texas for On-Site Sewage Facilities, secs. 6, 8, 9, 10(A), 12 and 13, adopted after public hearing 18 August 2014 — https://public.destinyhosted.com/tomgrmindocs/2014/COM/20140818_490/minutes/467_Order%20Adopting%20Rules%20TGC%20On-Site%20Sewage%20Facility.pdf
Texas Local Government Code sec. 240.032(b-1) — https://tcss.legis.texas.gov/resources/LG/htm/lg.240.htm; U.S. Census Bureau Vintage 2025 county and sub-county population estimates (co-est2025-alldata.csv and sub-est2025.csv) and the 2024 Gazetteer county and place files — https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/datasets/2020-2025/
TCEQ On-Site Sewage Facility Authorized Agent register (OARS), Tom Green County, county code 226 — https://www.tceq.texas.gov/permitting/ossf/aa_search.html; Order Adopting Rules of Tom Green County, Texas for On-Site Sewage Facilities, secs. 6, 8, 9, 10(A), 12 and 13, adopted after public hearing 18 August 2014 — https://public.destinyhosted.com/tomgrmindocs/2014/COM/20140818_490/minutes/467_Order%20Adopting%20Rules%20TGC%20On-Site%20Sewage%20Facility.pdf; Tom Green County Environmental Health — https://www.tomgreencountytx.gov/page/env.EnvHealthHome
The expensive surprises are in the ground, not the building
What moves a Texas budget is usually below grade, and it is soil rather than rock: shrink-swell clay. The Blackland Prairie and the Gulf Coast clays move enough between a wet season and a dry one to drive the foundation design across the state's largest markets, which is why several DFW cities require an engineer's seal on the foundation of every new house. Those are the same conditions that decide whether a septic field passes its soil and site evaluation, so the grading plan, the foundation and the drainfield get resolved together rather than one at a time. We price the dirt before we price the building.
What we build in Tom Green County
All nine of our services — kits, custom plans, post-frame and steel construction, site preparation, permitting and engineering, through to turnkey builds — are available across Tom Green County. What a project costs depends far more on the parcel than on square footage, so we work from your land rather than from a rate card.
See what we buildWhat a build looks like
Three stages every Tom Green County project passes through, from a raw parcel to a finished home. Site work first, because that is where the budget is decided.
The parcel
Zoning, setbacks, flood zone and utility access get checked before anything is drawn.
Pad and permit
Clearing, grading and a compacted pad, while the submittal works through Tom Green County.
Frame to finish
Shell erected and dried in, then systems, insulation and interior finish through to CO.
Those are the rules for Tom Green County. Tell us what you want to build and we will draw it to them.
Where we build around Tom Green County
Tom Green County and the rural land around it. The buildable acreage for a project this size usually sits outside the city limits, which is frequently what changes who issues your permit.
Keep reading
The questions that usually come next once you know what Tom Green County allows.
Barndominium Cost Guide
Sourced per-square-foot ranges by tier and by size, with a calculator built on the same figures.
Read itIs It Legal in Texas?
Classification, zoning, the HOA gate, and why "nonresidential farm building" does not cover a home.
Read itHow Long Does It Take?
Census build-duration data, and what actually sets the permit clock where you are building.
Read itNearby areas we build in
Others we cover in this part of Texas. The permitting authority, the adopted design criteria and the zoning can all differ from one to the next.
Building in Tom Green County: common questions
12 questions we get asked most often about building in Tom Green County. If yours is not on the list, ask it directly.
Does Tom Green County have a building code for a house on unincorporated land?
So do I need a building permit from the county?
Which edition of the IRC applies?
Who does the three inspections?
Is there a ten-acre exemption from the septic permit?
Does the shop bay count against the size of the septic system?
What does the ground do to a foundation and a drainfield here?
Do I need permission to drill a water well?
Goodfellow Air Force Base is here. Does that restrict what I can build nearby?
Does the county zone land?
I want to build outside San Angelo but inside its extraterritorial jurisdiction. Who reviews the plat?
Does anything about the Gulf Coast windstorm rules apply out here?
Building in Tom Green County?
Start with the plan. Tell us what you want to build and we will draw it, then confirm what Tom Green County will actually let you put on the parcel and what wind load it has to meet. That conversation costs nothing.